Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Auto-Login Bypass and Code Validation (CVE-2026-9198)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch, SingCERT, BSI
- Actively exploited
- Source: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CSA/SingCERT How we classify
- Public exploit
What is affected, what to do
The vulnerability CVE-2026-9198 allows unauthenticated attackers to achieve full remote code execution (RCE) on default Langflow deployments through a code injection vulnerability. This is accomplished by chaining the /api/v1/auto_login endpoint, which generates SUPERUSER tokens, with /api/v1/validate/code, which executes user code. It affects Langflow versions 1.0.0 to 1.10.0 and is actively exploited in attack campaigns. Given its listing in the CISA KEV catalog, an immediate update to version 1.10.1 is recommended to mitigate the risk.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update langflow to version 1.10.1, Langflow Desktop OSS to version 1.10.1. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- IBM Langflow OSS
lte 1.0.0..1.10.0
- IBM Langflow OSS
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch, SingCERT, BSI
28.7 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 247.09 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CSA/SingCERT How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 28.7 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 98.1
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-94
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction. Chaining the auto-login endpoint with the code-validation endpoint yields full code execution on default deployments, which makes it ideal for automated mass scanning. Exploitation likelihood is very high, placing it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. CISA does not currently flag known ransomware use. Typical victims are quickly stood-up AI/LLM prototypes in data-science and innovation teams that often sit outside normal asset and patch management while concentrating valuable API keys and data access. Rate any instance reachable from the internet or from broad internal networks as critical and act immediately. Locally bound Desktop installs rank lower but still need patching.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Pull exposed instances off the internet now: Inventory every Langflow deployment (OSS, Docker, Desktop). Firewall off anything publicly reachable, whether on the default port 7860 or behind a reverse proxy. The exploit chain needs no authentication, so treat every reachable instance as potentially compromised.
- Patch: Upgrade Langflow OSS or Langflow Desktop to 1.10.1 or later (
pip install -U "langflow>=1.10.1"or the current container image). Versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 are affected. - Kill auto-login: Set
LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=Falseregardless of patch level. Define a dedicated superuser with a strong password viaLANGFLOW_SUPERUSERandLANGFLOW_SUPERUSER_PASSWORD, then restart the service. - Rotate secrets: Assume everything stored in Langflow is burned. This includes LLM provider API keys (OpenAI, Azure, watsonx, etc.), vector-DB and database credentials,
LANGFLOW_SECRET_KEY, and any host/pod environment variables or cloud tokens. - Preserve evidence, then rebuild: For instances that were reachable before patching, snapshot the container or VM and keep the Langflow database and proxy logs. Rebuild from a clean image rather than cleaning in place.
- Check reporting duties: If compromise is confirmed, start the NIS2 clock (early warning to the national CSIRT/BSI within 24 h).
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Keep Langflow on an internal segment or VLAN. Allow access only through VPN/ZTNA with an authenticating front end (e.g. OAuth2-Proxy backed by your IdP). Apply an egress allowlist so the host can reach only the LLM endpoints it needs, which blocks reverse shells and payload staging.
- WAF/reverse-proxy rule: Until patched, block
/api/v1/auto_loginand/api/v1/validate/codeat the proxy. For nginx:location ~ ^/api/v1/(auto_login|validate/code) { return 403; }. Add a WAF signature that drops POST bodies to these paths containingimport os,subprocess,__import__,exec(oreval(. - Host/container hardening: Run Langflow as an unprivileged user with a read-only root filesystem, no Docker socket mount and no
--privileged. Applycap_drop: ALLand enable seccomp/AppArmor profiles. - IAM/least privilege: Strip the host's or service account's cloud permissions to the minimum. Do not auto-mount Kubernetes service-account tokens. Store only narrowly scoped, spend-capped API keys inside Langflow.
- Configuration: Bind Langflow to
127.0.0.1instead of0.0.0.0when a local reverse proxy fronts it. Lock down CORS.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Web server/proxy logs: A hit on
/api/v1/auto_loginfrom an unexpected source, followed within minutes byPOST /api/v1/validate/codefrom the same IP. Example SPL:index=proxy uri_path IN ("/api/v1/auto_login","/api/v1/validate/code") | stats values(uri_path) dc(uri_path) as n by src_ip | where n=2 - EDR process ancestry: The Langflow Python/uvicorn process spawns
sh,bash,curl,wget,nc,python -corbase64. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: python* AND ParentCommandLine|contains: langflow AND Image|endswith: [/sh, /bash, /curl, /wget, /nc] - Linux auditd/Sysmon for Linux (EID 1/3):
execveevents whoseppidis the Langflow process, plus new outbound connections from it. Also watch for writes to~/.ssh/authorized_keys,/etc/cron*or/tmp. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): HTTP requests where
uriis/api/v1/validate/codeand the body contains Python imports. Follow up on subsequent outbound connections to unusual ports or to cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254). - Application layer: Audit the Langflow database for unknown superuser accounts, freshly minted API keys, or flows with embedded custom code created outside change windows.
- Web server/proxy logs: A hit on
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to chain /api/v1/auto_login (mints SUPERUSER tokens to any network caller) with /api/v1/validate/code (executes user code via exec()) to achieve full RCE on default Langflow deployments
Source: NVD (NIST), pwn.watch, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE), CSA/SingCERT, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Langflow OSS |
|
|
| langflow | langflow |
|
|
| IBM | Langflow Desktop OSS |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Entry at MITRE CWE-94
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| CSA/SingCERT | Active exploitation of Critical Vulnerability in IBM Langflow OSS (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERT | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | langflow-cve-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | PoC-CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-9198 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- ibm.comIBM Langflow — CVE-2026-9198Vendor advisory, Patch, pwn-watch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-9198government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: IBM Langflow: IBM Langflow Code Injection Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-9198pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedIBM
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed Langflow OSSLangflow OSSSource identifier: psirt@us.ibm.com
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference type added —CISA-ADP: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-9198 Types: US Government ResourceSource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-9198SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2026-9198","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-17T00:00:00+00:00"}{"id":"CVE-2026-9198","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-04T17:42:22.802585Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2026-9198","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-17T17:52:19.835444Z"}{"id":"CVE-2026-9198","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-17T00:00:00+00:00"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedIBM
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-94
Description added or changed
New references:Show 5 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Langflow OSSDescription added —IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to chain /api/v1/auto_login (mints SUPERUSER tokens to any network caller) with /api/v1/validate/code (executes user code via exec()) to achieve full RCE on default Langflow deploymentsCVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-94Reference added —https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278927Source identifier: psirt@us.ibm.com
Show one older change
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-9198","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-17T17:52:19.835444Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Linked advisories
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-9198"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-9198.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-9198 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>