Linux Kernel: security vulnerability (CVE-2026-80893)
Published Last modified Sources: HKCERT, Ubuntu, Debian LTS, SUSE, BSI, EUVD, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix swap entry corruption when clearing uffd-wp at fork() copy_hugetlb_page_range() clears the uffd-wp bit of migration and hwpoison entries with huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(), which operates on the present-PTE bit position. Swap entries keep the uffd-wp state elsewhere -- the migration branch reads and sets it with pte_swp_uffd_wp() and pte_swp_mkuffd_wp() -- and the present-PTE position falls into the swap payload.
Update Linux Kernel to version 6.1.183, Linux Kernel to version 6.6.151, Linux Kernel to version 6.12.103.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 5.19..6.1.183 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.2..6.6.151 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.7..6.12.103 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.18.44 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.19..7.1.8
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
6.1.183 - Linux Kernel
6.6.151 - Linux Kernel
6.12.103 - Linux Kernel
6.18.44 - Linux Kernel
7.1.8 - Linux Kernel
7.2
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
2.5
XIEM Effective CVSS
Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
2.5
CVSS v3
Severity Low on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: HKCERT, Ubuntu, Debian LTS, SUSE, BSI, EUVD, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org
0.2 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 6.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Low
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 36.73 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 2.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 2.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.2 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 6.8
- Low — this CVE sits in the lower 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 6 November 2026
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix swap entry corruption when clearing uffd-wp at fork() copy_hugetlb_page_range() clears the uffd-wp bit of migration and hwpoison entries with huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(), which operates on the present-PTE bit position. Swap entries keep the uffd-wp state elsewhere -- the migration branch reads and sets it with pte_swp_uffd_wp() and pte_swp_mkuffd_wp() -- and the present-PTE position falls into the swap payload. On x86-64 it lands in the inverted swap offset, where a naturally-aligned hugetlb PFN always has the affected bit set, so the clear advances the encoded PFN by two pages. No userfaultfd needs to be involved: the clear is guarded only by the child VMA not being uffd-wp registered, so a plain fork() with an in-flight hugetlb migration entry (or a poisoned hugetlb page) corrupts the entry copied into the child. Instrumenting the clear and forking after MADV_HWPOISON on a 2MB anon hugetlb page shows: offset before=120e00 offset after =120e02 The fallout is mostly latent: rmap walks match migration entries by folio range and remove_migration_pte() rebuilds the PTE from the folio, so a within-folio PFN skew heals once migration completes. But any path that re-encodes the corrupted offset -- e.g. hugetlb_change_protection() rewriting a writable migration entry via make_readable_migration_entry(swp_offset(entry)) -- propagates it. Migration entries legitimately carry uffd-wp, so clear it with pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(), matching copy_nonpresent_pte() and move_huge_pte(). A hwpoison entry, on the other hand, never carries the uffd-wp bit: it is installed fresh by make_hwpoison_entry() (try_to_unmap_one() does not preserve uffd-wp on the hwpoison path) and hugetlb_change_protection() leaves hwpoison entries untouched. There was nothing to clear there, only the corruption, so drop the clear entirely.
Source: HKCERT (CC BY 3.0 HK) · HKCERT rating: medium, Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian LTS Advisories, suse_csaf, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, ENISA EUVD, Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | linux | bookworm |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | resolute |
| Linux | debian | linux-6.12 | bookworm |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | resolute |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/f1b1311c0352873137768bac5a126e491271a747euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/69cb5825d9988c7944bc9f1dc08cb233655405a7euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/8b0de7005b148738d79d6c45594d566489948a68euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/2b9a07002c2f296aa6a9c591213933d3492e3089euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/2fa11c60c9c06bafc19cf4d9efdaa36a38079e87euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/83abe2fd5b3aeb3123b5408a5a91709c5538fb23euvd
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-80893","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-11-06T17:04:44.937840Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedLinux
Description added or changed
New references:- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b9a07002c2f296aa6a9c591213933d3492e3089
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fa11c60c9c06bafc19cf4d9efdaa36a38079e87
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69cb5825d9988c7944bc9f1dc08cb233655405a7
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83abe2fd5b3aeb3123b5408a5a91709c5538fb23
and 2 more references
Show 8 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix swap entry corruption when clearing uffd-wp at fork() copy_hugetlb_page_range() clears the uffd-wp bit of migration and hwpoison entries with huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp(), which operates on the present-PTE bit position. Swap entries keep the uffd-wp state elsewhere -- the migration branch reads and sets it with pte_swp_uffd_wp() and pte_swp_mkuffd_wp() -- and the present-PTE position falls into the swap payload. On x86-64 it lands in the inverted swap offset, where a naturally-aligned hugetlb PFN always has the affected bit set, so the clear advances the encoded PFN by two pages. No userfaultfd needs to be involved: the clear is guarded only by the child VMA not being uffd-wp registered, so a plain fork() with an in-flight hugetlb migration entry (or a poisoned hugetlb page) corrupts the entry copied into the child. Instrumenting the clear and forking after MADV_HWPOISON on a 2MB anon hugetlb page shows: offset before=120e00 offset after =120e02 The fallout is mostly latent: rmap walks match migration entries by folio range and remove_migration_pte() rebuilds the PTE from the folio, so a within-folio PFN skew heals once migration completes. But any path that re-encodes the corrupted offset -- e.g. hugetlb_change_protection() rewriting a writable migration entry via make_readable_migration_entry(swp_offset(entry)) -- propagates it. Migration entries legitimately carry uffd-wp, so clear it with pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(), matching copy_nonpresent_pte() and move_huge_pte(). A hwpoison entry, on the other hand, never carries the uffd-wp bit: it is installed fresh by make_hwpoison_entry() (try_to_unmap_one() does not preserve uffd-wp on the hwpoison path) and hugetlb_change_protection() leaves hwpoison entries untouched. There was nothing to clear there, only the corruption, so drop the clear entirely.Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/80xxx/CVE-2026-80893.json">CVE-2026-80893</a>Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b9a07002c2f296aa6a9c591213933d3492e3089Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fa11c60c9c06bafc19cf4d9efdaa36a38079e87Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69cb5825d9988c7944bc9f1dc08cb233655405a7Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83abe2fd5b3aeb3123b5408a5a91709c5538fb23Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b0de7005b148738d79d6c45594d566489948a68Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b1311c0352873137768bac5a126e491271a747Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-80893"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-80893.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-80893 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>