Linux Kernel: security vulnerability (CVE-2026-80835)
Published Last modified Sources: HKCERT, Ubuntu, Debian LTS, Debian, BSI, CVE.org, EUVD
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qcom-rng - Remove crypto_rng interface qcom-rng.c exposes the same hardware through two completely separate interfaces, crypto_rng and hwrng. However, the implementation of this is buggy because it permits generation operations from these interfaces to run concurrently with each other, accessing the same registers.
Update Linux Kernel to version 6.12.108, Linux Kernel to version 6.18.49, Linux Kernel to version 7.1.13.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 6.7..6.12.108 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.18.49 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.19..7.1.13 - Linux Kernel
lt 7.2..7.2.3
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
6.12.108 - Linux Kernel
6.18.49 - Linux Kernel
7.1.13 - Linux Kernel
7.2.3 - Linux Kernel
7.3
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
—
XIEM Effective CVSS
No value is available for this vulnerability.
0.0
CVSS v3
Severity Not rated on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: HKCERT, Ubuntu, Debian LTS, Debian, BSI, CVE.org, EUVD
0.2 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 6.2
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Not rated
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 24.37 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 0.0
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.2 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 6.2
- Low — this CVE sits in the lower 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qcom-rng - Remove crypto_rng interface qcom-rng.c exposes the same hardware through two completely separate interfaces, crypto_rng and hwrng. However, the implementation of this is buggy because it permits generation operations from these interfaces to run concurrently with each other, accessing the same registers. That is, qcom_rng_generate() synchronizes with itself but not with qcom_hwrng_read(). This results in potential repetition of output from the RNG, output of non-random values, etc. Fortunately, there's actually no point in hardware RNG drivers implementing the crypto_rng interface. It's not actually used by anything besides the "rng" algorithm type of AF_ALG, which in turn is not actually used in practice. Other crypto_rng hardware drivers are likewise being phased out, leaving just the hwrng support. Thus, remove it to simplify the code and avoid conflict (and confusion) with the hwrng interface which is the one that actually matters.
Source: HKCERT (CC BY 3.0 HK) · HKCERT rating: medium, Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian LTS Advisories, Debian Security Advisories, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), ENISA EUVD, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | linux | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | resolute |
| Linux | debian | linux-6.12 | bookworm |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | resolute |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/bb474dcd9d0224264a27a60891f00872b879835feuvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/14d9ee8286460a7b82f3b8610b5c7ebf4550b06beuvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/843e2bdaf8deb8bc341203094dfe582e38ea4af2euvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/669d940351eda316b82e24986e2e0e057653ce7deuvd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/2ecdf5c9910e20f73639bc322f0518a3439d17c0euvd
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/80xxx/CVE-2026-80835.json">CVE-2026-80835</a>Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
ReceivedLinux
Description added or changed
New references:- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14d9ee8286460a7b82f3b8610b5c7ebf4550b06b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ecdf5c9910e20f73639bc322f0518a3439d17c0
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/669d940351eda316b82e24986e2e0e057653ce7d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/843e2bdaf8deb8bc341203094dfe582e38ea4af2
and 1 more reference
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qcom-rng - Remove crypto_rng interface qcom-rng.c exposes the same hardware through two completely separate interfaces, crypto_rng and hwrng. However, the implementation of this is buggy because it permits generation operations from these interfaces to run concurrently with each other, accessing the same registers. That is, qcom_rng_generate() synchronizes with itself but not with qcom_hwrng_read(). This results in potential repetition of output from the RNG, output of non-random values, etc. Fortunately, there's actually no point in hardware RNG drivers implementing the crypto_rng interface. It's not actually used by anything besides the "rng" algorithm type of AF_ALG, which in turn is not actually used in practice. Other crypto_rng hardware drivers are likewise being phased out, leaving just the hwrng support. Thus, remove it to simplify the code and avoid conflict (and confusion) with the hwrng interface which is the one that actually matters.Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/80xxx/CVE-2026-80835.json">CVE-2026-80835</a>Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14d9ee8286460a7b82f3b8610b5c7ebf4550b06bReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ecdf5c9910e20f73639bc322f0518a3439d17c0Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/669d940351eda316b82e24986e2e0e057653ce7dReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/843e2bdaf8deb8bc341203094dfe582e38ea4af2Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb474dcd9d0224264a27a60891f00872b879835fSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-80835"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-80835.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-80835 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>