Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2026-21514)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, EUVD
What is affected, what to do
Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021 to version 16.106.26020821, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024 to version 16.106.26020821. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise
gte 16.0.1..* - Microsoft Office LTSC 2021
gte 16.0.1..* - Microsoft Office LTSC 2024
gte 16.0.0..* - Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021
lt 16.0.1..16.106.26020821 - Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024
lt 16.0.0..16.106.26020821
- Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021
16.106.26020821 - Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024
16.106.26020821
- Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, EUVD
1.6 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 75.4
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 198.79 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 1.6 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 75.4
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-807
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
CISA added this CVE to KEV on the same day Microsoft shipped the fix, and the CVSS vector records functional exploit code. Together these point to targeted phishing with crafted Word documents that defeat Office's built-in protections to launch follow-on payloads. Exploitation needs only a user opening a file — no authentication — and the impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability is high, although CISA records no known ransomware use. Overall exploitation likelihood is moderate, but organisations with heavy inbound document traffic (public sector, KRITIS, manufacturing, legal and finance) should rate it high: patch exposed workstations within 72 hours and enable the ASR rules immediately.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the security update: Microsoft has released an official fix for Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise, Office LTSC 2021 and Office LTSC 2024. The context does not supply Windows build numbers — look up the fixed builds in the MSRC advisory for CVE-2026-21514. Force the update across all Microsoft 365 Apps channels (Current, Monthly Enterprise, Semi-Annual) via Intune, ConfigMgr or the Office Deployment Tool rather than waiting for the staged rollout.
- macOS endpoints: Bring Office LTSC for Mac 2021/2024 to 16.106.26020821 or later. Enforce Microsoft AutoUpdate with a deadline via MDM (Jamf/Intune).
- Verify coverage: Query Defender Vulnerability Management, your EDR or ConfigMgr for Office builds below the advisory's fixed version. Fast-track phishing-exposed groups first: finance, HR, procurement and executives.
- Tighten the mail gateway: Until rollout is complete, route externally sourced Word attachments (.doc, .docx, .docm, .rtf, .dot, .dotm) to sandbox detonation or quarantine. Exploitation requires a user to open a crafted document.
- Start a retro-hunt: Search mailboxes and download folders back to late January 2026 for external Word documents that led to WINWORD.EXE child processes or outbound connections on endpoints (see Detection rules).
- Classification note: CISA labels this vulnerability privilege escalation, while NVD labels it a security feature bypass. Operationally, treat it as a crafted document bypassing Office protections such as Protected View, Mark-of-the-Web checks or OLE/content blocking.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
-
Endpoint hardening (ASR): Set these Defender ASR rules to Block:
- "Block all Office applications from creating child processes" (D4F940AB-401B-4EFC-AADC-AD5F3C50688A)
- "Block Office applications from creating executable content" (3B576869-A4EC-4529-8536-B80A7769E899)
- "Block Office applications from injecting code into other processes" (75668C1F-73B5-4CF0-BB93-3ECF5CB7CC84)
These rules still fire if Word's own security decision is bypassed.
-
Office configuration via GPO/Intune:
- Enforce Protected View for internet-zone files and Outlook attachments.
- Block macros in files from the internet.
- Use Trust Center File Block settings to force legacy formats (Word 97-2003, RTF) from untrusted sources to open in Protected View only.
- Restrict OLE/ActiveX activation.
-
IAM / least privilege: Remove local admin rights from standard users (LAPS, Endpoint Privilege Management). This confines a successful bypass to the user context.
-
Network layer:
- Restrict WINWORD.EXE egress via host firewall or proxy policy to known Microsoft endpoints.
- Block outbound SMB (TCP 445/139) at the perimeter.
- Block WebDAV to the internet (User-Agent "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir" over 80/443) to break common document-borne staging chains.
-
Application control: Use WDAC/AppLocker to deny mshta.exe, wscript.exe and cscript.exe for standard users. Block execution from %TEMP%, %APPDATA% and INetCache paths.
-
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): WINWORD.EXE spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe, pwsh.exe, mshta.exe, rundll32.exe, regsvr32.exe, wscript.exe, cscript.exe or certutil.exe. KQL:
DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "winword.exe" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","mshta.exe","rundll32.exe","regsvr32.exe","wscript.exe","certutil.exe") - ASR events: Microsoft-Windows-Windows Defender/Operational, Event ID 1121 (blocked) and 1122 (audit) with WINWORD.EXE as the source. Treat any hit on an unpatched host as an incident.
- Network telemetry (Sysmon EID 3 / Zeek): WINWORD.EXE connecting to non-Microsoft destinations shortly after an attachment is opened. Watch especially for external SMB (445) or HTTP requests with User-Agent "Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery" or "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir".
- File creation (Sysmon EID 11): WINWORD.EXE writing executables (.exe, .dll, .hta, .lnk, .js, .vbs) to %TEMP%, %APPDATA% or Startup folders. Sigma shape:
Image|endswith: '\WINWORD.EXE'withTargetFilename|endswith: ['.exe','.dll','.hta','.lnk','.js','.vbs']. - macOS (EDR / unified log): "Microsoft Word" spawning /bin/sh, /bin/zsh, osascript or curl. This ancestry is atypical in normal use.
- Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): WINWORD.EXE spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe, pwsh.exe, mshta.exe, rundll32.exe, regsvr32.exe, wscript.exe, cscript.exe or certutil.exe. KQL:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, ENISA EUVD, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Office LTSC 2021 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Office LTSC 2024 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024 |
|
|
| microsoft | 365_apps |
|
|
| microsoft | office_long_term_servicing_channel |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-807Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
Base
The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
Entry at MITRE CWE-807
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerabilityeuvd, Vendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-21514government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Office: Microsoft Office Word Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-21514pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-21514"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-21514.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-21514 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>