CriticalCVE-2026-20963

    Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2026-20963)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, CERT-EU

    What is affected, what to do

    Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 to version 16.0.5535.1001, Microsoft SharePoint Server 2019 to version 16.0.10417.20083, Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition to version 16.0.19127.20442. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 lt 16.0.0..16.0.5535.1001
    • Microsoft SharePoint Server 2019 lt 16.0.0..16.0.10417.20083
    • Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition lt 16.0.0..16.0.19127.20442
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 16.0.5535.1001
    • Microsoft SharePoint Server 2019 16.0.10417.20083
    • Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition 16.0.19127.20442

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, CERT-EU

    29.2 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.2

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    239.59 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), NCSC NZ How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    29.2 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    98.2
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-502

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and yields full code execution in the app-pool context, which makes it ideal for mass scanning and automated exploitation. Its exploitation likelihood ranks among the highest of all scored CVEs. CISA does not currently flag ransomware use, but past SharePoint deserialization bugs were quickly turned into webshell deployment, machine-key theft and follow-on AD compromise. Treat internet-facing on-premises farms as an emergency with a 24-hour patch deadline, and internal-only farms as high priority for the next maintenance window.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Find exposed farms first: Inventory every SharePoint server reachable from the internet (TCP 80/443, including publication via a reverse proxy or ADC). Check the build with (Get-SPFarm).BuildVersion. Builds below 16.0.5535.1001 (Enterprise Server 2016), 16.0.10417.20083 (Server 2019) and 16.0.19127.20442 (Subscription Edition) are vulnerable.
      • Apply the security update: Install the update that delivers those builds. Look up the KB number in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2026-20963. Then run PSConfig.exe -cmd upgrade -inplace b2b -wait or the Products Configuration Wizard on every server. The fix is incomplete without this step.
      • If you cannot patch now: Block external access to the web applications at the firewall or reverse proxy, or restrict it to VPN or zero-trust access, until the patch is in place.
      • Hunt before reconnecting: Review IIS logs and EDR telemetry back to at least the KEV addition date (see Detection rules). Check the LAYOUTS directories (...\Web Server Extensions\16\TEMPLATE\LAYOUTS\) for newly created .aspx files.
      • Rotate key material: If compromise is suspected, and as a precaution after patching, rotate the ASP.NET machine keys. Use Set-SPMachineKey/Update-SPMachineKey or the "Machine Key Rotation" timer job, then run iisreset on all servers. A stolen ValidationKey otherwise keeps signed payloads working after the patch.
      • Secure service accounts: On confirmed code execution, reset the passwords of the farm, app-pool and search service accounts. Review AD logons by these accounts for lateral movement.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Publish SharePoint only behind a pre-authenticating reverse proxy (e.g. Entra Application Proxy, ADFS WAP, F5 APM). Apply egress filtering so servers can reach only update and Microsoft 365 endpoints, which stops payload staging and C2.
      • AMSI integration: Enable SharePoint AMSI integration per web application, using Full Mode on Subscription Edition and 2019. Run Defender AV or another AMSI-capable product on every farm server.
      • WAF/IPS: Block or alert on unauthenticated POSTs to /_layouts/15/*.aspx and /_vti_bin/* that carry oversized or Base64-heavy bodies or ViewState parameters. Give spoofed-Referer requests involving /_layouts/SignOut.aspx dedicated handling. Enable vendor signatures for CVE-2026-20963 once they are released.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use an ASR rule or EDR policy to stop w3wp.exe from spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe, csc.exe or certutil.exe. Test the rule in audit mode first.
      • Least privilege: Run app-pool identities without local admin rights and keep them separate from the farm account. Restrict their SQL permissions.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • EDR/Sysmon process ancestry (EID 1, Security 4688): w3wp.exe spawns a shell or compiler. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "w3wp.exe" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","csc.exe","rundll32.exe")
      • Webshell drop (Sysmon EID 11): A new .aspx or .ashx under the LAYOUTS path, written by w3wp.exe or one of its children. Sigma shape: TargetFilename|contains: '\TEMPLATE\LAYOUTS\' AND TargetFilename|endswith: '.aspx'.
      • IIS access logs: Unauthenticated POSTs (cs-username = -) to /_layouts/15/ returning 200, followed by GETs to previously unseen .aspx files. SPL: index=iis cs_method=POST cs_uri_stem="/_layouts/15/*" cs_username="-" | stats count by c_ip, cs_uri_stem
      • Key theft: PowerShell script-block logs (EID 4104) or AMSI events referencing MachineKeySection, ValidationKey or System.Web.Configuration. Triage any Defender alerts for SharePoint exploit or webshell signatures.
      • Network (Zeek/Suricata): Outbound connections from SharePoint servers to unfamiliar destinations, or unusual DNS lookups, shortly after bursts of inbound POSTs.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Source: NCSC NZ (CC BY 4.0), pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE), certeu_advisory

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016
    • 16.0.0 – < 16.0.5535.1001
    • 16.0.5535.1001
    MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Server 2019
    • 16.0.0 – < 16.0.10417.20083
    • 16.0.10417.20083
    MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition
    • 16.0.0 – < 16.0.19127.20442
    • 16.0.19127.20442
    microsoftsharepoint_server
    • 2019
    • 2016
    • < 16.0.19127.20442
    • —
    • —
    • 16.0.19127.20442

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-502Deserialization of Untrusted Data

      Base

      The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-502

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    NCSC NZCVE-2026-20963 affecting SharePoint Server (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZactively exploited

    References & sources

    • Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20963government-resource, US government resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft SharePoint: Microsoft SharePoint Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-20963pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-20963
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-20963"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-20963.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-20963 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>