Broadcom VMware vCenter Server Out-of-bounds Write Vulnerability (CVE-2024-37079)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: SingCERT, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
vCenter Server contains a heap-overflow vulnerability in the implementation of the DCERPC protocol. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter Server may trigger this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted network packet potentially leading to remote code execution.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update cloud_foundation to version 5.2. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- VMware vCenter Server
gte 8.0..* - VMware vCenter Server
gte 7.0..* - VMware Cloud Foundation
eq 5.x..5.x - VMware Cloud Foundation
eq 4.x..4.x
- VMware vCenter Server
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: SingCERT, CVE.org
22.4 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 97.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 230.76 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 22.4 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 97.7
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 23 January 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-787
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
vCenter is the control plane of the virtualisation estate — unauthenticated, network-reachable code execution effectively hands an attacker every managed host, VM and dataset, including virtualised domain controllers and backup infrastructure. The flaw needs no credentials or user interaction and carries a very high exploitation likelihood; vCenter is also a favoured foothold for long-term stealthy access because appliances rarely run EDR. CISA has not flagged ransomware use, but the platform remains a classic lever for estate-wide encryption or sabotage. For KRITIS and NIS2-scoped organisations, treat any unpatched instance reachable from other segments as critical with immediate remediation; strictly isolated instances should still be patched with high priority in the next short-notice maintenance window.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory every vCenter instance (7.0, 8.0) and VMware Cloud Foundation deployment (4.x, 5.x) via CMDB and network scanning — including forgotten lab, DR and test vCenters. Record build numbers via VAMI (
https://<vcenter>:5480) orvpxd -v. - Apply the vendor patch: Broadcom advisory VMSA-2024-0012 lists vCenter Server 8.0 U2d (or 8.0 U1e for the U1 branch) and 7.0 U3r as fixed releases. For VMware Cloud Foundation, the context lists 5.2 as fixed; for 4.x and earlier 5.x builds, a patch is available from the vendor — check the vendor advisory for the exact version. Take a snapshot or file-based backup of the appliance first. Broadcom states there is no in-product workaround — updating is the only complete fix.
- Restrict reachability now: vCenter must not be reachable from the internet or from client/server networks with no management role. Firewall all vCenter ports down to dedicated admin jump hosts or the management VLAN — notably 443/tcp, 5480/tcp and DCERPC endpoints (e.g. 135/tcp or dynamic RPC ports where exposed).
- Compromise assessment for previously unpatched, exposed instances: check for crash artefacts (core dumps), unknown processes and new local accounts (see detection rules). If suspicious, isolate, take a forensic image, and avoid a casual reboot.
- Rotate credentials if compromise is suspected:
administrator@vsphere.local, appliance root, backup/monitoring service accounts and ESXi credentials stored in vCenter; reissue the STS signing certificate.
- Inventory every vCenter instance (7.0, 8.0) and VMware Cloud Foundation deployment (4.x, 5.x) via CMDB and network scanning — including forgotten lab, DR and test vCenters. Record build numbers via VAMI (
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: run vCenter only inside an isolated management segment with allowlisted east-west flows (jump hosts, ESXi hosts, backup servers, identity source). Block and log inbound DCERPC from all other zones.
- Egress control on the appliance: vCenter typically needs only defined destinations (NTP, DNS, AD/LDAP, Broadcom update repository or local mirror). Block everything else — especially arbitrary internet destinations — to stop reverse shells and exfiltration after code execution.
- IPS/NDR: enable signatures for malformed or oversized DCERPC fragments (fragmented bind/request PDUs with inconsistent length fields) towards vCenter IPs; check vendor rule sets (Suricata/Snort ET, Palo Alto, Fortinet) for CVE-2024-37079 coverage and run them in blocking mode.
- Appliance hardening: disable SSH and the BASH shell on the appliance unless operationally required; enable remote syslog to the SIEM so logs survive tampering.
- IAM/least privilege: admin access only via named AD accounts with MFA (identity federation) and a PAM solution; restrict
administrator@vsphere.localto break-glass use and alert on every login.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): DCERPC sessions to vCenter from non-approved source networks. Zeek example:
dce_rpc.log | where id.resp_h in (vcenter_ips) and id.orig_h !in (mgmt_allowlist); plus Suricatadcerpcanomaly alerts (fragment reassembly errors) against those targets. - Crash artefacts on the appliance: failed heap-overflow attempts often crash services. Watch for new files under
/storage/coreor/var/coreand repeated service restarts in/var/log/vmware/vmon/as an early warning. - Process ancestry (auditd/EDR where available on the appliance): VMware service processes (e.g.
vmdird,vpxd,rhttpproxy,lwsmd) spawning/bin/bash,sh,python,curl,wget,nc. Sigma shape:ParentImage|contains: ['vmdird','vpxd','lwsmd'] AND Image|endswith: ['/bash','/sh','/curl','/wget','/nc']. - Persistence and account changes: new entries in
/etc/passwd, new keys in/root/.ssh/authorized_keys, altered cron jobs or systemd units; in vCenter (vpxd) events, new SSO users, role assignments or identity-source changes. SPL example:index=vcenter ("UserCreated" OR "RoleAdded" OR "PermissionAdded") | stats count by user, src. - Post-exploitation abuse: unexpected VM creation, cloning or power-off, datastore downloads of domain controller
.vmdkfiles, and SSH being enabled on ESXi hosts outside maintenance windows.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): DCERPC sessions to vCenter from non-approved source networks. Zeek example:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
vCenter Server contains a heap-overflow vulnerability in the implementation of the DCERPC protocol. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter Server may trigger this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted network packet potentially leading to remote code execution.
Source: CSA/SingCERT, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | VMware Cloud Foundation |
|
|
| — | VMware vCenter Server |
|
|
| vmware | cloud_foundation |
|
|
| vmware | vcenter_server |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write
Base
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Entry at MITRE CWE-787
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- support.broadcom.comweb/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/Securit…Patch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-37079government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-37079"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-37079.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-37079 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>