Graphify Fortran extractor: incomplete cpp #include hardening allows arbitrary host-file read/exfiltration when indexing an untrusted repo
Published
What is affected, what to do
The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
—
Priority
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
CVSS v3
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
EPSS score
No value is available for this vulnerability.
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Not rated
Priority score
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 30.00
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
The Fortran extractor's C-preprocessor step (graphify/extractors/fortran.py, _cpp_preprocess) applies an incomplete #include hardening. The -nostdinc -I /dev/null flags it relies on (comment "Security (F-007)") do not stop a capital-F Fortran source file from including absolute paths (#include "/etc/passwd") or from path-traversing out of the corpus (#include "../../../../home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa"). cpp always searches the directory of the file being preprocessed for quoted includes and always honours absolute include paths, regardless of -nostdinc/-I. As a result, indexing an untrusted repository that contains a .F/.F90/.F95/.F03/.F08 file reads arbitrary local files off the host and inlines their contents into the knowledge graph, which is then shipped to the LLM/agent and written to the on-disk, shareable output (graph.json, GRAPH_REPORT.md, the Obsidian wiki, HTML/SVG exports).
This is the exact "corpus-side file-exfiltration vector" the F-007 comment says it is defending against; the mitigation is bypassable.
Severity
High. Arbitrary local-file read on the host, triggered by graphify's core action (indexing an untrusted folder — "turn any folder of code ... into a queryable knowledge graph"), defeating a documented security control. It runs on the default, offline, no-API-key AST path (graphify update . / graphify extract) — no credentials, network, or LLM call required. CWE-73 (external control of file name/path) / CWE-22 (path traversal) / CWE-200 (information exposure).
Where
graphify/extractors/fortran.py, _cpp_preprocess():
result = subprocess.run(
["cpp", "-w", "-P", "-nostdinc", "-I", "/dev/null", str(path.resolve())],
capture_output=True, timeout=30,
)
Reached from extract_fortran() (same file) for any suffix in _FORTRAN_CPP_EXTS = {".F", ".F90", ".F95", ".F03", ".F08"}, which are collected by default (detect.CODE_EXTENSIONS) and dispatched by extract._DISPATCH.
Why the mitigation does not work
-nostdinc only removes the standard system include directories, and -I /dev/null only sets the additional search path. Neither affects:
- Absolute includes —
#include "/etc/passwd"is opened directly by cpp. - Quoted includes relative to the current file — cpp always searches the directory containing the file being preprocessed for
#include "...", so#include "../../../../etc/shadow"traverses out of the corpus.
Proof of concept (verified)
Reproduced against the shipped code with the exact command _cpp_preprocess builds (cpp -w -P -nostdinc -I /dev/null <file>), and against extract_fortran() directly.
Secret on disk (/tmp/secret.txt): TOP_SECRET_...
(a) Absolute include — evil_abs.F90:
program evil
#include "/absolute/path/to/secret.txt"
end program evil
(b) Relative traversal — evil_rel.F90:
program evil
#include "../secret.txt"
end program evil
Both produce preprocessed output containing the full secret file contents ("SECRET IN OUTPUT: True" for both).
Surfacing into the graph — leak.F90 places the include in an identifier position via a free-form continuation so the leaked value becomes a node/edge:
module m
contains
subroutine s
use &
#include "/path/to/token.secret"
end subroutine s
end module m
extract_fortran() on this file emits a node whose label is the entire single-line contents of token.secret and an imports edge to it. That node is written to graph.json / GRAPH_REPORT.md / the wiki and returned by the MCP query_graph / get_node / get_neighbors tools — i.e. exfiltrated into the agent's context and into persisted, shareable artifacts.
Fidelity note: Fortran is case-insensitive, so captured identifiers are lower-cased. Case-insensitive secrets (file paths, hostnames, usernames, hex tokens, connection-string fragments, and the mere existence/partial content of a readable file) leak cleanly; high-entropy case-sensitive blobs (base64/JWT) are partially corrupted by the lower-casing but still confirm readability and structure. Single-token-per-line secret files (API-key files, single-line credential/token files) leak that token in full (lower-cased). Requires cpp/gcc on PATH (near-ubiquitous on the dev/CI hosts graphify targets); it cleanly falls back to raw bytes when absent.
Suggested fix
Mirror the containment approach already used elsewhere in the codebase (_project_xml_is_safe, security.validate_graph_path): before invoking cpp, scan the source for #include directives and refuse or neutralise any include whose target is absolute or resolves outside the corpus/repo root. Concretely, in _cpp_preprocess:
- Parse
#include "..."/#include <...>directives. - Resolve each target against the file's directory; if it is absolute, or its
.resolve()escapes the scan root, strip that line (or fall back topath.read_bytes()with no preprocessing). - Only allow includes that resolve to a path inside the corpus root.
A blunter but safe alternative is to strip all #include lines before preprocessing (macros still expand; cross-file includes lose fidelity but no host files can be read). Running cpp inside a filesystem sandbox (bwrap/unshare with only the corpus mounted) would also close it but is heavier.
Detected by
Aeon vuln-scanner. Semgrep flagged the Fortran subprocess path; manual review of the F-007 mitigation plus an empirical cpp repro confirmed the bypass.