Microsoft Internet Explorer and Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability (CVE-2016-3351)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 and Microsoft Edge allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted web site, aka "Microsoft Browser Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
eq 9..9 - Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
eq 10..10 - Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
eq 11..11
- Microsoft Internet Explorer 11
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
6.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
6.5
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
26.5 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.0
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 234.35 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 6.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 6.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 26.5 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 98.0
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 23 June 2022
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
On its own this is an information-disclosure flaw. However, it is network-reachable without authentication and needs nothing more than a visit to a crafted page. Malvertising campaigns and exploit kits used it to check for security products, analysis tools or virtualisation before delivering the real payload, which let them evade sandboxes and researchers. CISA flags it as used in ransomware campaigns, and it sits among the CVEs with very high exploitation likelihood. If your estate has no live IE or legacy Edge usage, the risk is low and documenting their retirement is sufficient. Where legacy hosts still browse the internet with IE (common in OT, medical devices or line-of-business apps), treat it as high priority, because those hosts are almost certainly exposed to the code-execution bugs this vulnerability is used to tee up.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory: Identify every endpoint where Internet Explorer 9–11 or legacy Edge (EdgeHTML) can still be launched. Use software inventory and MDM/Intune queries for
mshtml.dll/edgehtml.dllfile versions, oriexplore.exe/MicrosoftEdge.exeexecutions in EDR telemetry. Hosts this far behind are usually missing many later browser fixes too. - Patch: Microsoft fixed the issue in the September 2016 cumulative security updates for Internet Explorer and Edge (bulletins MS16-104 / MS16-105). On supported systems, deploy the current Windows cumulative update, which supersedes them. Look up the exact KB per OS in the vendor advisory.
- Retire legacy browsers: Disable IE11 as a standalone browser via the GPO "Disable Internet Explorer 11 as a standalone browser" or the IE disablement update. Legacy Edge is end-of-life; replace it with Chromium-based Microsoft Edge.
- Isolate unpatchable assets: Move out-of-support hosts (Windows 7/8.1, embedded, OT HMIs relying on IE) into a dedicated segment. Block general web browsing for them at the proxy.
- Compromise assessment: For hosts with sustained IE browsing, review proxy logs for exploit-kit and malvertising patterns (see Detection rules). This bug is typically the reconnaissance step before a code-execution exploit.
- Inventory: Identify every endpoint where Internet Explorer 9–11 or legacy Edge (EdgeHTML) can still be launched. Use software inventory and MDM/Intune queries for
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Configuration / browser hardening: Make Chromium Edge the default browser. Allow IE mode only through a centrally managed Enterprise Mode Site List for explicitly required internal apps (
InternetExplorerIntegrationLevel+InternetExplorerIntegrationSiteList). Disable redirection of incompatible sites to IE. - Network / proxy: Block, or at minimum alert on, external requests carrying
Trident/orMSIEuser agents. Apply category filtering for ad networks, newly registered domains and uncategorised sites, since delivery is predominantly via malvertising. - IPS / web gateway: Enable Suricata/ET exploit-kit landing-page and browser-fingerprinting signatures. In particular, catch scripts that probe for local files via
res://resource requests ormhtml:constructs, typically checking for AV or analysis tooling or VM drivers. - Endpoint hardening: Enforce Enhanced Protected Mode and Protected Mode for all zones. Disable ActiveX in the Internet zone. Turn on Microsoft Defender ASR rules restricting child processes, to slow down follow-on stages.
- IAM / least privilege: Browse only with standard-user rights. Admin accounts get no internet access (tiering, PAWs). This limits the blast radius of the second-stage exploit.
- Configuration / browser hardening: Make Chromium Edge the default browser. Allow IE mode only through a centrally managed Enterprise Mode Site List for explicitly required internal apps (
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Web proxy logs: Look for external requests with IE user agents (
MSIE 9.0,MSIE 10.0,Trident/7.0) that coincide with ad-redirect chains (multiple 302s through ad domains). Example in SPL:index=proxy http_user_agent="*Trident/*" | stats dc(dest_host) by src_ip | where 'dc(dest_host)'>50. - Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688: Flag
iexplore.exeorMicrosoftEdgeCP.exeas parent spawningpowershell.exe,cmd.exe,wscript.exe,mshta.exe,rundll32.exeorregsvr32.exe. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: '\iexplore.exe'combined withImage|endswithfrom that list. A hit indicates the stage that follows fingerprinting. - Sysmon EID 11 / EDR file events: Watch for executables (
.exe,.dll,.scr) written to INetCache or%TEMP%by a browser process and executed shortly afterwards. - Zeek/Suricata: Watch for heavily obfuscated JavaScript, or payloads hidden steganographically in PNG/GIF responses from ad domains. Also flag short-lived domains followed by
application/octet-streamdownloads. - Inventory check (preventive): This Defender for Endpoint KQL finds remaining legacy browsers:
DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName in~ ("iexplore.exe","MicrosoftEdge.exe") | summarize count() by DeviceName.
- Web proxy logs: Look for external requests with IE user agents (
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 and Microsoft Edge allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted web site, aka "Microsoft Browser Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft | edge |
|
|
| microsoft | internet_explorer |
|
|
Vendors and products
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- securitytracker.com1036789Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK
- securityfocus.com92788Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID
- brokenbrowser.comdetecting-apps-mimetype-malwarex_refsource_MISC
- docs.microsoft.comMS16-104Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS
- docs.microsoft.comMS16-105Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS
- securitytracker.com1036788Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2016-3351government-resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2016-3351"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2016-3351.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2016-3351 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>