CriticalCVE-2016-0034

    Microsoft Silverlight Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2016-0034)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code or perform a denial-of-service attack remotely via a crafted website due to mishandling of negative offsets during decoding in Microsoft Silverlight versions before 5.1.41212.0. It is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns and requires no authentication for exploitation. Affected organizations should urgently upgrade to version 5.1.41212.0 to mitigate the risk.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update Microsoft Silverlight to version 5.1.41212.0. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Silverlight lt 5.0..5.1.41212.0
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft Silverlight 5.1.41212.0

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    8.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    69.4 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.36

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    247.98 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    69.4 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.36
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 1 July 2022

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable without authentication and only needs a user to visit a crafted page. That makes it a natural fit for drive-by campaigns, which historically used exploit kits to push ransomware; CISA flags known ransomware use. Exploitation likelihood remains very high despite the product's age, and successful exploitation means full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability on the endpoint. Treat any surviving installation as a critical legacy risk and remove it first, with the highest urgency on hosts running Internet Explorer with open web access.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Sweep all Windows endpoints and terminal servers for Microsoft Silverlight. Check the registry value HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Silverlight\Version or the folder C:\Program Files\Microsoft Silverlight\, using SCCM/Intune inventory, EDR software lists or Get-ItemProperty.
      • Uninstall rather than patch: Silverlight is end-of-support. Where no business dependency exists, remove it entirely via software distribution or msiexec /x with the product code from the local Uninstall key.
      • If removal is not immediately possible: Upgrade Silverlight 5 to at least 5.1.41212.0, since every earlier 5.x build is vulnerable. The patch is available from the vendor; look up the bulletin and KB number in the vendor advisory. Confirm the deployed version through inventory once the rollout completes.
      • Prioritise exposed hosts: Start with systems running Internet Explorer or Edge IE mode with unrestricted web access. Terminal servers, jump hosts and admin workstations come first, because compromise there has the widest blast radius.
      • Retro-hunt: Wherever outdated versions turn up, search proxy logs for the past weeks for .xap downloads from unknown domains. Flag matching hosts for forensic preservation.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network/proxy: Block MIME type application/x-silverlight-app and the .xap extension at the web proxy or SWG. Allow exceptions only for documented internal applications.
      • Browser hardening (GPO): Disable the Silverlight ActiveX control in Internet Explorer through Group Policy, either via the add-on list or by disabling ActiveX for the Internet and Restricted zones. Restrict Edge IE mode to an enterprise site list.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use WDAC/AppLocker to stop npctrl.dll and agcore.dll from loading outside approved hosts. Enable ASR rules that restrict child-process creation from browser and Office contexts.
      • IPS/exploit-kit defence: Turn on vendor IPS signatures for Silverlight exploitation and common exploit-kit landing pages. Add DNS filtering for newly registered and known-malicious domains, because delivery is typically drive-by via crafted websites.
      • Least privilege: Run users without local admin rights. This limits the impact of code execution in the browser context and makes persistence harder.
      • Legacy dependencies: Move any line-of-business app that genuinely needs Silverlight into isolated VDI or remote browser isolation with no internet egress, and schedule its replacement.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • EDR process ancestry: Watch for iexplore.exe with npctrl.dll/agcore.dll loaded that then spawns cmd.exe, powershell.exe, wscript.exe, mshta.exe, rundll32.exe or regsvr32.exe. KQL example: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "iexplore.exe" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","wscript.exe","mshta.exe","rundll32.exe")
      • Sysmon EID 7 + EID 1: Look for an image load of npctrl.dll or agcore.dll followed within seconds by process creation (EID 1) whose parent is iexplore.exe. Implement this as a Sigma correlation rule.
      • Proxy/web logs: Flag responses with Content-Type: application/x-silverlight-app or URIs ending in .xap from external or unknown hosts, especially after redirect chains (several 302s in a row). SPL example: index=proxy (uri="*.xap" OR content_type="application/x-silverlight-app") | stats count by src, dest_host
      • Zeek/Suricata: In http.log or files.log, look for Silverlight-MIME downloads followed by a PE download to the same client. That pattern indicates a second-stage payload.
      • Crash telemetry: Clusters of Windows Event ID 1000 (Application Error) for iexplore.exe with faulting module agcore.dll may indicate failed exploitation attempts (object-header corruption).

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Microsoft Silverlight 5 before 5.1.41212.0 mishandles negative offsets during decoding, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (object-header corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Silverlight Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."

    Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    microsoftsilverlight
    • 5.0 – < 5.1.41212.0
    • 5.1.41212.0

    Vendors and products

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2016-0034
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2016-0034"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2016-0034.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2016-0034 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>