Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy Authentication Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2024-55591)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: SingCERT, NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org
- Actively exploited
- Source: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), ANSSI / CERT-FR, NCSC NZ, CSA/SingCERT How we classify
- Ransomware
- Public exploit
What is affected, what to do
An authentication bypass vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain super-admin privileges through crafted requests to the Node.js websocket module. This vulnerability is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since 2024. Affected versions include FortiOS 7.0.0 to 7.0.17 and FortiProxy 7.0.0 to 7.0.20, as well as 7.2.0 to 7.2.13. It is critical to update to the latest versions to mitigate this vulnerability. The flaw is listed in the CISA KEV catalog and has a high exploit maturity.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update fortiproxy to version 7.0.20. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Fortinet FortiOS
lte 7.0.0..7.0.16 - Fortinet FortiProxy
lte 7.2.0..7.2.12 - Fortinet FortiProxy
lte 7.0.0..7.0.19
- Fortinet FortiOS
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.6
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.6
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: SingCERT, NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org
94.4 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.85
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 260.29 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), ANSSI / CERT-FR, NCSC NZ, CSA/SingCERT How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.6 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.6
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 94.4 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.85
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-288
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and hands an attacker super-admin on a perimeter device. That puts it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited, and CISA flags it for known ransomware use. The typical pattern is mass scanning for exposed Fortinet admin interfaces, followed by attackers creating their own admin and VPN accounts and using SSL-VPN as the foothold for internal ransomware operations. Any organisation running FortiOS 7.0.x or FortiProxy 7.0.x/7.2.x with an internet-reachable management interface should treat this as an emergency change, with the compromise assessment as a mandatory step. Where management is reachable only internally, priority remains high, but the patch can follow your standard emergency-patch process.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Establish exposure: Inventory every FortiGate (FortiOS 7.0.x) and FortiProxy (7.0.x, 7.2.x) instance. Check whether the HTTP/HTTPS admin interface is reachable from the internet or from untrusted segments: run an external scan of port 443 or the configured
admin-sport, and reviewshow system interfaceforallowaccess https/http. - Lock down management access now: Remove
httpsandhttpfromallowaccesson all WAN-facing interfaces. Where that is not operationally possible, restrict access to dedicated admin source networks with alocal-in-policy. Do this before the patch rollout, because it closes the attack path immediately. - Patch: Upgrade FortiOS to 7.0.17 or later. Upgrade FortiProxy to 7.0.20 or later or 7.2.13 or later. Check the Fortinet PSIRT advisory for exact builds and upgrade paths. Back up the running config before upgrading, because you will need it as forensic evidence.
- Run a compromise assessment before patching: Upgrading does not remove persistence an attacker has already set up. Look for:
- unknown admin accounts (
config system admin), - new local users and changes to SSL-VPN user groups,
- altered firewall policies and new address objects. Diff the current config against the last known-good backup.
- unknown admin accounts (
- If you find indicators: Treat the device as fully compromised.
- Rotate all admin passwords.
- Renew LDAP/RADIUS bind accounts, IPsec PSKs, SSL-VPN credentials and device certificates.
- Rebuild the config from a clean baseline rather than carrying the compromised config forward.
- Hunt for lateral movement originating from VPN sessions.
- Check reporting obligations: A confirmed compromise at a NIS2/KRITIS entity starts the 24 h early-warning clock (BSI or your national CSIRT). Bring in IR leadership and legal early.
- Establish exposure: Inventory every FortiGate (FortiOS 7.0.x) and FortiProxy (7.0.x, 7.2.x) instance. Check whether the HTTP/HTTPS admin interface is reachable from the internet or from untrusted segments: run an external scan of port 443 or the configured
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Expose the management plane only on a dedicated management interface or management VDOM/VRF. Allow access only from an admin jump-host network, never from the internet.
- Local-in policy (FortiOS CLI): First add an allow rule for the admin source address object on
HTTPS/HTTP, then a catch-all deny:config firewall local-in-policy→set intf "wan1"→set srcaddr "all"→set dstaddr "all"→set service "HTTPS" "HTTP"→set schedule "always"→set action deny- The allow rule must sit above the deny. Verify the result with an external test.
- Upstream IPS/WAF: Where an upstream inspection point can see decrypted TLS, block and alert on requests carrying
Upgrade: websocketto/ws/paths on the admin UI from non-allowlisted sources. Without TLS inspection, source-IP filtering is your only control here. - IAM / least privilege: Keep
super_adminprofiles to a minimum, and enforce MFA and trusted hosts on admin accounts. Note that trusted hosts alone are not a reliable defence against this authentication bypass. Treat them as a complement to network-level blocking, not a replacement. - Configuration integrity monitoring: Ship regular config backups off-box and alert on any change to
system.admin,user.localoruser.group, for example via FortiManager revision diffs or a scripted diff.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- FortiGate event log (admin login via jsconsole): Successful logins with
ui="jsconsole"/method="jsconsole"are a key indicator, particularly with oddsrcip/dstippairs such as loopback addresses.- SPL:
index=fortigate logdesc="Admin login successful" ui="jsconsole"
- SPL:
- New admin or user accounts: Detect
logdesc="Object attribute configured"withcfgpathinsystem.admin,user.localoruser.groupandaction="Add", especially where usernames look random.- KQL:
CommonSecurityLog | where DeviceVendor == "Fortinet" and AdditionalExtensions has_any ("system.admin","user.local","user.group") and Activity has "configured"
- KQL:
- Post-exploitation SSL-VPN abuse: Review VPN logins from accounts created in the last 30 days. Also check sessions from unusual geolocations and tunnels that immediately generate internal RDP/SMB traffic (Zeek
conn.log: VPN pool → internal ports 445/3389). - Out-of-window policy changes: Detect changes to
firewall.policyandfirewall.addressthat have no matching change ticket. As a Sigma shape:logsource: fortinet/fortigate,selection: subtype=system, cfgpath|startswith: firewall., plus a time-window filter. - Network telemetry: Use NetFlow/Zeek to watch inbound HTTPS from the internet to the management IP. Once lockdown is in place, any non-allowlisted external source indicates scanning or a control that is not working.
- FortiGate event log (admin login via jsconsole): Successful logins with
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability [CWE-288] affecting FortiOS version 7.0.0 through 7.0.16 and FortiProxy version 7.0.0 through 7.0.19 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 allows a remote attacker to gain super-admin privileges via crafted requests to Node.js websocket module.
Source: CSA/SingCERT, NCSC NZ (CC BY 4.0), pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiProxy |
|
|
| fortinet | fortiproxy |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.0 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.1 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.10 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.11 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.12 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.13 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.14 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.15 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.16 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.2 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.3 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.4 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.5 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.6 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.7 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.8 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | 7.0.9 |
| Mobile | fortinet | fortios | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-288Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
Base
The product requires authentication, but the product has an alternate path or channel that does not require authentication.
Entry at MITRE CWE-288
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| CSA/SingCERT | Critical Vulnerability in FortiOS and FortiProxy (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERT | actively exploited | |
| NCSC NZ | Vulnerability affecting FortiOS and FortiProxy (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZ | actively exploited | |
| ANSSI / CERT-FRLicence Ouverte 2.0, as of | CERTFR-2025-ALE-002 – [MàJ] Vulnérabilité dans les produits Fortinet (clôturée 2025-05-07) (opens in a new tab)cert.cyber.gouv.fr | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2024-55591 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | cve-2024-55591-poc (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- fortiguard.fortinet.compsirt/FG-IR-24-535pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-55591government-resource
- cert.atCERT.at: Ransomware-Gruppen nutzen weiterhin kritische Fortinet-Schwachstellen - Warnung vor gepatchten, aber bereits kompromittierten Gerätencert-at
- cert.cyber.gouv.frANSSI / CERT-FR: CERTFR-2025-ALE-002 – [MàJ] Vulnérabilité dans les produits Fortinet (clôturée 2025-05-07)cert-fr
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy: FortiOS and FortiProxy Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-55591pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Linked advisories
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-55591"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-55591.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-55591 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>